![]() ![]() Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. I mean, I assume someone who knew how to find sources about the cat food industry could easily whip together something - but that person ain't I. WP:N was only proposed in the fall of 2006, about when Wikipedia:Non-notability ended up being rejected. Summer 2007 probably is the end of the beginning, so yes, that doesn't look crazy there, but would've looked crazy a year later.Have standards changed that much in the last 8 years? Doctorhawkes ( talk) 07:31, (UTC) Reply My immediate reaction was delete, as it is hard to find genuine coverage on what is just a standard cat food, but I notice the last vote was massively to keep. Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ![]() Shiftchange ( talk) 08:57, (UTC) Reply Delete No long-term significance for a completely unremarkable product.If that can be documented, then I would keep the article. Tentative Delete in the absence of references to prove the key statement, of being the number 2 brand in the country.I looked up the only listed source, and did a search for "Snappy Tom" ( ) and all three results that came up say "Safcol Petcare's Snappy Tom Cat Litter" so it's not even cat food which makes this made up. Snappy Tom ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log Īdvertising orphan for cat food that seems to fail GNG as it lacks any significant coverage and it uses all kinds of promotional terms such as "As of 2004, it was the number two brand" and "ran a long-term promotion". Articles for deletion/Snappy Tomato Pizza. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |